4 ms·
The only replacement for typing I can see taking over would be a mind interface, but even there I have a suspicion that it'll require 'thinking in a different v
by NikkiA 3y ago
The only replacement for typing I can see taking over would be a mind interface, but even there I have a suspicion that it'll require 'thinking in a different voice' that'll make it almost as tiring as voice control.
- JohnFen 3y agoI had the same thought. Maybe it would be like our internal monologue voice (which I learned not everyone has). So instead of just one in there, we'd have two. Or maybe it would be a combination of internal voice and ephemeral voiceless conception, or maybe thinking with "intent". Whatever it would be, it would certainly take effort to some degree.
- NikkiA 3y agoI don't know about anyone else, obviously, but my internal monologue is very poorly focused at times, I can be mentally editing code and suddenly think about donuts, or squirrels. Maybe AI could filter that nonsense out based on contextual clues, but not the AI we have so far, hence I think the monologue would need that second voice. 'Remember Nikki, think all code things and only code things in scottish... Aye, I shall.... och, bollocks!'
- an_aparallel 3y agosublingual vocalisation to the rescue - i think there is work being done on translating that to something able to be used to control stuff :)
- fsiefken 3y agoSRV https://atelier.net/ve-tech-radar/tech-radar/subvocal-recognition https://atelier.net/ve-tech-radar/tech-radar/subvocal-recogn... https://web.stanford.edu/class/cs224s/project/reports_2017/Pol_Rosello.pdf https://web.stanford.edu/class/cs224s/project/reports_2017/P... https://annals-csis.org/Volume_11/drp/pdf/153.pdf https://annals-csis.org/Volume_11/drp/pdf/153.pdf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subvocal_recognition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subvocal_recognition