2 ms·
Major war on general purpose computing vibes resumes 'It's in the users best interest to not let them bring their own computer & have to use a Google approved
by jauntywundrkind 3y ago
Major war on general purpose computing vibes resumes
'It's in the users best interest to not let them bring their own computer & have to use a Google approved computer because [fill in corporate doublespeak bullshit here]'.
Fwiw, the whole system of native apps have dealt with this hlkind of crap forever & it's expected. An old super small native app we had failed pen testing because it would run on jailbroke devices. Google Play SafetyNet and probably three other frameworks on Android all exist to make sure users don't have ownership of devices.
So this is basically a Google Project Fugu effort, but the dark side. the web should be capable of doing everything native apps do, even when that thing is placing a huge boot on the face of users & rejecting their user-agency. Womp womp.
Also, notably, Apple already shipped a just as bad implementation of PrivateTokens where websites can ask Apple to make sure the device is legitimate. I'm not sure why Google built a new spec, why they decided to be a huge lightning rod for this, a lightning rod with much less cover from publicity, as instead of being a generic attestation system (and relying on Apple having dominion over their platform in a way Android lacks), it's a very narrow attestation system about device integrity. https://httptoolkit.com/blog/apple-private-access-tokens-attestation/ https://httptoolkit.com/blog/apple-private-access-tokens-att...