3 ms·
> proof of intent to cause psychological harm, versus teasing without any clue about the impacts of one's actions Teasing, whether you have a clue or not, is i
by inetknght 3y ago
> proof of intent to cause psychological harm, versus teasing without any clue about the impacts of one's actions
Teasing, whether you have a clue or not, is intent to cause psychological harm.
> Without proof of intended malice, or evidence of actual harm, it's not a matter for criminal procedure.
I concur. However I think it absolutely is grounds for a civil matter.
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> Teasing, whether you have a clue or not, is intent to cause psychological harm As someone who teased and was teased, was bullied and may have crossed into bullying, I disagree. The behaviours, when done with a group, are the seeking of social approval. The victim is closer to irrelevant than targeted. Where it crosses into bullying or harassment is where the victim is germane.