3 ms·
The presumption there being that the only possible evidence for collusion is the existence of hard-requirements levied on each party. Unless you're misreading
by niam 3y ago
The presumption there being that the only possible evidence for collusion is the existence of hard-requirements levied on each party.
Unless you're misreading my reply to mean the absence of hard-evidence.
- s1artibartfast 3y agothe thing is that the crime of collusion is defined not by behavior, but by agreement. It is 100% legal to offer the same price as your competitors, even if an entire industry is doing it. it only becomes illegal if parties make an explicit agreement. Hard-requirements would demonstrate an explicit agreement.