3 ms·
I'm not arguing for specifics in implementation, rather the outcomes: Better use of productive land and infrastructure. If the current structure isn't providin
by ProfessorLayton 3y ago
I'm not arguing for specifics in implementation, rather the outcomes: Better use of productive land and infrastructure.
If the current structure isn't providing that, then perhaps LVT is the way to go over our current structure. If it turns out LTV didn't provide the desired outcomes, then let's try something else!
The current status quo of letting developers speculate endlessly while holding back growth or even providing negative economic externalities doesn't seem to be working as well as it could be.