3 ms·
Reminded me of this counter-perspective from an essay on AI writing: >In the days after the Sudowrite pile-on, those who had been helping to test its novel gen
by z7 3y ago
Reminded me of this counter-perspective from an essay on AI writing:
>In the days after the Sudowrite pile-on, those who had been helping to test its novel generator huddled on the Sudowrite Slack, feeling attacked. The outrage by published authors struck them as classist and exclusionary, maybe even ableist. Elizabeth Ann West, an author on Sudowrite’s payroll at the time who also makes a living writing Pride and Prejudice spinoffs, wrote, “Well I am PROUD to be a criminal against the arts if it means now everyone, of all abilities, can write the book they’ve always dreamed of writing.” It reminded me of something Sims had told me. “Storytelling is really important,” he’d said. “This is an opportunity for us all to become storytellers.” The words had stuck with me. They suggested a democratization of creative freedom.
https://www.wired.com/story/confessions-viral-ai-writer-chatgpt/ https://www.wired.com/story/confessions-viral-ai-writer-chat...
- peteradio 3y agoHow does that make you a storyteller? It makes you a curator or editor at best but it's not your mojo.
- z7 3y agoYeah, that's what I thought as well, though the article discusses some examples of how the author used the AI to generate sentences or passages for their own texts rather than generate complete stories.
- peteradio 3y agoYea but is that what a regular author does? It seems dishonest without attribution if you are fielding lyric ideas from friends and then wholesaling them as your works.