3 ms·

Thanks. I have some experience with Big Five and MBTI, but I’m not satisfied with them since they are too general in what they describe and also they’re not sci

Thanks. I have some experience with Big Five and MBTI, but I’m not satisfied with them since they are too general in what they describe and also they’re not scientific enough imho. I’d be happy to see more rigorous research in this area because it could be both useful for self-development and it sometimes might help to understand oneself as well. And it’s also fun to do these assessments :p I’m curious of your take on these tests

dukeyukey 3y ago
The Big Five are legit, worked out through decades of psychology analysis and studies. MBTI is astrology for nerds.
- raverbashing 3y ago
  And type A/B is like astrology with only 2 signs, funded by tobacco companies and developed by cardiologists Not sure why this stuff lives on but it seems to be a meaningless way of classifying people