3 ms·
While i don't disagree, that's missing the forest for the trees - the point is having the freedom to share models and continue to open-source. I'll argue that
by flockonus 3y ago
While i don't disagree, that's missing the forest for the trees - the point is having the freedom to share models and continue to open-source.
I'll argue that between stable diffusion and llama 2, there is nothing highly specific that prevents [very] large amount of people from adopting these models and specializing for them own needs.
The tragedy would be if those went away.
- shrimpx 3y agoYeah but llama2-level AI may be insignificant in power compared to future models, which may be inaccessible to the public. Even assuming the algorithms/code are open, people at large won't be able to create working models.
- flockonus 3y agoNot sure at all, when you look at amount of opensource being done in regards to quantization. One of many examples: https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Llama-2-7B-GGML https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Llama-2-7B-GGML