3 ms·
The final product is usually a mediocre cash-in with plenty of CGI and cardboard plots and characters. The AI argument is part of the usual problem - creative
by TheOtherHobbes 3y ago
The final product is usually a mediocre cash-in with plenty of CGI and cardboard plots and characters.
The AI argument is part of the usual problem - creative and original interesting new work isn't rewarded because it isn't guaranteed to make easy money.
In fact if given the chance, some of it would. A lot of modern(ish) classics barely made it through the gatekeeping, which suggests an even larger of likely classics didn't.
Ai will lock that down further, so there will be less and less chance of a product that isn't homogenised, risk-free, market-tested, lifeless, corporate anti-culture.
- throwaway4aday 3y agoAI is quickly unlocking studio quality production for individual creatives in much the same way that authors can now self-publish, anyone with an iPhone can create rather stunning photographs and video, independent artists can create and distribute incredible digital art, music and animated CGI films, games, etc. Existing production houses can also use this to improve their output as well of course but they'll have to actually take a risk on doing something new rather than Avengers 1-100