4 ms·

This Lex Fridman interview with Greg Lukianoff, the CEO of FIRE organisation mentioned in the article, provides more useful information on the subject matter:

This Lex Fridman interview with Greg Lukianoff, the CEO of FIRE organisation mentioned in the article, provides more useful information on the subject matter: https://lexfridman.com/greg-lukianoff/ https://lexfridman.com/greg-lukianoff/

runako 3y ago
> provides more useful information I should hope so, it's nearly 3 hours long. I hope this trend passes where people don't make any effort to edit their interviews, or even prioritize their questions. Arguably more effort is required to do an excellent 45-minute interview than a 3-hour podcast, but that extra effort is rewarded by increased reach. I hope that lesson doesn't get lost to history.
- karmakurtisaani 3y ago
  We could start by not just providing a 3 hour interview as a reference, but actually summarize a key point or two from it.
  - shthed 3y ago
    https://lexfridman.com/greg-lukianoff-transcript https://lexfridman.com/greg-lukianoff-transcript at least he provides a full transcript with subject titles and timestamps, feel free to search for relevant parts
    - runako 3y ago
      I mean that still puts all the effort on the reader vs the interviewer. Part of the point of a good interview is it's not just a brain dump, it's a curated conversation that helps enlighten the listener. > feel free to search for relevant parts Part of the value of an interview done well is that it helps enlighten me about what I might find relevant. How would I possibly know what parts are relevant before listening, unless I were going in with an agenda or trying to research a specific item? He interviews really powerful people; searching through their thoughts seems like the worst possible way to consume this information. A transcript like this might be useful for researchers, but will still have limited reach because few people have the luxury of being able to read a transcript of a 3-hour interview.

runako 3y ago

> provides more useful information I should hope so, it's nearly 3 hours long. I hope this trend passes where people don't make any effort to edit their interviews, or even prioritize their questions. Arguably more effort is required to do an excellent 45-minute interview than a 3-hour podcast, but that extra effort is rewarded by increased reach. I hope that lesson doesn't get lost to history.

karmakurtisaani 3y ago
We could start by not just providing a 3 hour interview as a reference, but actually summarize a key point or two from it.
- shthed 3y ago
  https://lexfridman.com/greg-lukianoff-transcript https://lexfridman.com/greg-lukianoff-transcript at least he provides a full transcript with subject titles and timestamps, feel free to search for relevant parts
  - runako 3y ago
    I mean that still puts all the effort on the reader vs the interviewer. Part of the point of a good interview is it's not just a brain dump, it's a curated conversation that helps enlighten the listener. > feel free to search for relevant parts Part of the value of an interview done well is that it helps enlighten me about what I might find relevant. How would I possibly know what parts are relevant before listening, unless I were going in with an agenda or trying to research a specific item? He interviews really powerful people; searching through their thoughts seems like the worst possible way to consume this information. A transcript like this might be useful for researchers, but will still have limited reach because few people have the luxury of being able to read a transcript of a 3-hour interview.