It's a weirdly structured paragraph, and it doesn't seem like the article is justifying some of its claims (like "Apple's high-end workstation SoCs still cannot

It's a weirdly structured paragraph, and it doesn't seem like the article is justifying some of its claims (like "Apple's high-end workstation SoCs still cannot compete against workstation-grade offerings from renowned CPU developers"), but I wouldn't call it a typo. M3 Pro shouldn't be mentioned at all as there are no Geekbench results for it yet. https://browser.geekbench.com/search?q=apple+m3 https://browser.geekbench.com/search?q=apple+m3