2 ms·
Typo in article: When it comes to multi-threaded workloads, results of Apple's M3 and M3 Max are a mixed bag in Geekbench 6. Should be: When it comes to
by runjake 3y ago
Typo in article:
When it comes to multi-threaded workloads, results of Apple's M3 and M3 Max are a mixed bag in Geekbench 6.
Should be:
When it comes to multi-threaded workloads, results of Apple's M3 and M3 Pro are a mixed bag in Geekbench 6.
- re 3y agoIt's a weirdly structured paragraph, and it doesn't seem like the article is justifying some of its claims (like "Apple's high-end workstation SoCs still cannot compete against workstation-grade offerings from renowned CPU developers"), but I wouldn't call it a typo. M3 Pro shouldn't be mentioned at all as there are no Geekbench results for it yet. https://browser.geekbench.com/search?q=apple+m3 https://browser.geekbench.com/search?q=apple+m3
- barbariangrunge 3y agoanother detail: > enabling them to manage even the most challenging workloads with ease. The hardware needed to handle the most challenging possible workloads would take almost infinite resources, and all the energy in the universe. So this is not quite accurate. I also doubt certain web apps and badly optimized games will perform well no matter the cpu Just wanted to be a part of the nitpicking before my lunch break ends