3 ms·
Think about how much fewer wives would be beaten if the Government had a camera in everyone's bedroom, or how much money we'd save on taxes if law enforcement c
by nextparadigms 15y ago
Think about how much fewer wives would be beaten if the Government had a camera in everyone's bedroom, or how much money we'd save on taxes if law enforcement could do anything they wanted without a warrant.
Yes it's sarcasm, but I don't think the law enforcement agencies see it like that. They actually want that, and they've said before that having to get a warrant makes it "hard" for them - even though 90% of the warrants they ask for are approved.
Lately all of them are pushing for more invasion of privacy, because they don't see it like that. They see it as "making our job easier" - without any regard for the abuses that could lead to or for history of Government oppression, or if the people actually want that. After all, surely they know "best" what needs to be done to protect the population.
- haberman 15y ago> Yes it's sarcasm, but I don't think the law enforcement agencies see it like that. Maybe some do, but some privacy advocates think it would be best if individuals could always prevent law enforcement from obtaining any evidence. Don't make arguments that are just as absurd as the extremists on the other side.
- tptacek 15y agoThere is no law enforcement agency in the country that wants cameras in everyone's bedroom.
- andybak 15y agoAnd the Missing the Point award goes to...