3 ms·
That would be letting the courts interpret how the existing law applies to a new situation through. They may decide something that is not ideal.
by jowea 3y ago
That would be letting the courts interpret how the existing law applies to a new situation through. They may decide something that is not ideal.
- jjk166 3y agoFrom a legal standpoint it is not a new situation. If you create some novel invention and use it to rob a bank, the laws against robbery do not need reinterpretation.
- omginternets 3y ago>They may decide something that is not ideal. I don't follow your argument. That same problem applies to legislators and regulators. Also, I don't see any legal novelty. Same shit, different tech.
- jowea 3y agoLegislators are at least supposed to consider different positions, interests and consequences and decide in the interest of the citizenry. Courts are supposed to just look at the law and precedents. And I meant novelty for AI in general. This specific case does seem like same shit different tech.