3 ms·
We should be free to use celebrity voices for private purposes. I would love if I could replace Siri’s voice with Scarlett Johansson instead.
by xwdv 3y ago
We should be free to use celebrity voices for private purposes. I would love if I could replace Siri’s voice with Scarlett Johansson instead.
- mfer 3y agoWhy? Just because you would love to do something with it isn't a reason. What's a reason we should be able to do this?
- zamadatix 3y ago"Because I'd love to" is a great reason to to do something. The negation usually comes from the other negative impacts what you want to do has, not because it's inherently an invalid piece of justification.
- bratbag 3y agoIf there is zero difference to Johansson either way, and the use is purely private and never shared, then why is personal enjoyment insufficient justification?
- xwdv 3y agoUsually it is insufficient justification for those who want to profit off something people do freely for fun.
- JohnFen 3y ago> We should be free to use celebrity voices for private purposes. We are, in the US anyway. It's just when you distribute IP to others that things get dicey.
- manicennui 3y agoIf they choose to sell the rights.