11 ms·
Why did you reply then? I've removed the snark but perhaps it's better to engage with the substance of a comment. Edit : You didn’t engage with the substance
by klelatti 3y ago
Why did you reply then?
I've removed the snark but perhaps it's better to engage with the substance of a comment.
Edit : You didn’t engage with the substance of the comment which was about RPi’s perspective but instead made an unrelated comment about why Arm would do the investment.
- freedomben 3y agoI don't know if you edited it out, but at least currently it is unclear to me that you're commenting on the perspective of RPi rather than ARM (which is TFA). Without that, it's unreasonable to be annoyed by the reply comment IMHO. Particularly with snark (which removal I applaud) is quite counterproductive.