4 ms·

1. "I think GPT-3 is artificial general intelligence, AGI. I think GPT-3 is as intelligent as a human. And I think that it is probably more intelligent than a h

1. "I think GPT-3 is artificial general intelligence, AGI. I think GPT-3 is as intelligent as a human. And I think that it is probably more intelligent than a human in a restricted way… in many ways it is more purely intelligent than humans are. I think humans are approximating what GPT-3 is doing, not vice versa.” — Connor Leahy, co-founder of EleutherAI, creator of GPT-J (November 2020) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrV19SjKUss&t=175s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrV19SjKUss&t=175s 2. https://www.noemamag.com/artificial-general-intelligence-is-already-here/ https://www.noemamag.com/artificial-general-intelligence-is-... 3. Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712 https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712 The especially funny thing bout this paper is that the original title in the tex source on that arxiv page is "First Contact With an AGI System" \title{%\textbf{WORK IN PROGRESS - DO NOT SHARE} \\ %First Contact With an AGI System} \textbf{Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence:} \\ \textbf{Early experiments with GPT-4}} 4. Artificial muses: Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Have Risen to Human-Level Creativity. These guys just switched the order of two words so they wouldn't have to call it AGI lol. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12003 https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12003 5. Open ai. GPTs are GPTs (General Purpose Technologies): An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models - https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10130 https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10130 6. Accuracy of a Generative Artificial Intelligence Model in a Complex Diagnostic Challenge - The old switcheroo again. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2806457 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/28064... There isn't a testable definition of General Intelligence that GPT-4 would fail that a chunk of humans also wouldn't. If there are some humans that can't pass your bar of general intelligence then it is not a test of general intelligence.

lm28469 3y ago
> 1. co-founder of EleutherAI Biased, like Musk when he sold the model S as fully autonomous in 2 years, back in 2012, still nowhere to be seen in 2023 > 2. Cool opinion, both of them work for .... Google > 3. Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence Biased since it was done by Microsoft which is heavily invested in openai > 4. These guys just switched the order of two words so they wouldn't have to call it AGI lol. Generative != General > 5. 6. Seem unrelated I'll believe when I see it. Chatgpt is to AGI what the wheel is to an ICBM, it might lead there at some point but we'll need a lot of breakthrough in a lot of disciplines before we can see the link.
- famouswaffles 3y ago
  >Biased, like Musk when he sold the model S as fully autonomous in 2 years GPT-3 was not a product of Eleuther. Eleuther doesn't sell anything. Everything it releases is open source and free. They are non profit. >Cool opinion, both of them work for .... Google Yes because working for one of the leading companies in the field is sure evidence to not take it seriously. Good thinking. I should trust the comment of a random person on the internet more seriously. How is 5 unrelated ? You have Open ai literally telling you language models are general purpose.
  - lm28469 3y ago
    > How is 5 unrelated ? You have Open ai literally telling you language models are general purpose > they could have considerable economic, social, and policy implications. We're almost a full year into the AGI revolution and literally nothing happened, wouldn't that be a big cue ? And yes, people who's paycheck depends on AGI existing telling me AGI exists is a red flag. Especially when I can boot up chatgpt and check for myself...
    - fragmede 3y ago
      Ah yes, chatgpt, a product well known for being to-the-minute up to date, and not making things up (aka lying).
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
AnimalMuppet 3y ago
You can find a few people who say anything. You have a few quotes. That doesn't mean that the consensus is that GPT-3/4 is AGI. My general sense is that the consensus is that it is not an AGI, but I'm not in the field.
- famouswaffles 3y ago
  I didn't claim any consensus on anything. I don't care what the consensus is. People move posts. People are shortsighted. ENIAC was declared the first general purpose computer years after the fact. as it stands currently, nobody can provide a testable definition of general intelligence that GPT-4 fails that a chunk of humans also doesn't. Think about that. anyone, including you who says GPT isn't agi is working off a definition that if testable, not all humans would be able to pass. That is far more important to me than any "consensus". The OP i was replying to made it seem like nobody out there was of the opinion that we've already achieved agi and i was replying to counter that.
  - alienicecream 3y ago
    Humans can tell the truth, and humans can lie. GPT can do neither.

lm28469 3y ago

> 1. co-founder of EleutherAI Biased, like Musk when he sold the model S as fully autonomous in 2 years, back in 2012, still nowhere to be seen in 2023 > 2. Cool opinion, both of them work for .... Google > 3. Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence Biased since it was done by Microsoft which is heavily invested in openai > 4. These guys just switched the order of two words so they wouldn't have to call it AGI lol. Generative != General > 5. 6. Seem unrelated I'll believe when I see it. Chatgpt is to AGI what the wheel is to an ICBM, it might lead there at some point but we'll need a lot of breakthrough in a lot of disciplines before we can see the link.

famouswaffles 3y ago
>Biased, like Musk when he sold the model S as fully autonomous in 2 years GPT-3 was not a product of Eleuther. Eleuther doesn't sell anything. Everything it releases is open source and free. They are non profit. >Cool opinion, both of them work for .... Google Yes because working for one of the leading companies in the field is sure evidence to not take it seriously. Good thinking. I should trust the comment of a random person on the internet more seriously. How is 5 unrelated ? You have Open ai literally telling you language models are general purpose.
- lm28469 3y ago
  > How is 5 unrelated ? You have Open ai literally telling you language models are general purpose > they could have considerable economic, social, and policy implications. We're almost a full year into the AGI revolution and literally nothing happened, wouldn't that be a big cue ? And yes, people who's paycheck depends on AGI existing telling me AGI exists is a red flag. Especially when I can boot up chatgpt and check for myself...
  - fragmede 3y ago
    Ah yes, chatgpt, a product well known for being to-the-minute up to date, and not making things up (aka lying).
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]

AnimalMuppet 3y ago

You can find a few people who say anything. You have a few quotes. That doesn't mean that the consensus is that GPT-3/4 is AGI. My general sense is that the consensus is that it is not an AGI, but I'm not in the field.

famouswaffles 3y ago
I didn't claim any consensus on anything. I don't care what the consensus is. People move posts. People are shortsighted. ENIAC was declared the first general purpose computer years after the fact. as it stands currently, nobody can provide a testable definition of general intelligence that GPT-4 fails that a chunk of humans also doesn't. Think about that. anyone, including you who says GPT isn't agi is working off a definition that if testable, not all humans would be able to pass. That is far more important to me than any "consensus". The OP i was replying to made it seem like nobody out there was of the opinion that we've already achieved agi and i was replying to counter that.
- alienicecream 3y ago
  Humans can tell the truth, and humans can lie. GPT can do neither.