5 ms·
This assertion is not supported by the text of Biden’s Executive Order. There are a number of requirements placed on various government agencies to come up with
by davepeck 3y ago
This assertion is not supported by the text of Biden’s Executive Order. There are a number of requirements placed on various government agencies to come up with safety evaluation frameworks, to make initial evaluations related to open weight models, and to provide recommendations back to the President within 270 days. But there’s nothing whatsoever that I can find that outlaws open weight models. There’s also little reason to think that “outlaw them” would be amongst the recommendations ultimately provided to the executive.
(I can imagine recommendations that benefit incumbents by, for instance, placing such high burden on government adoption of open weight models that OpenAI is a much more attractive purchase. But that’s not the same as what you’re talking about.)
I dunno, the EO seems pretty easy to read. Am I missing something in the text?
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/10/30/executive-order-on-the-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence/ https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-action...
- s1gnp0st 3y agoYeah, they're not going to outlaw them. The well-worn path is to make the regulatory burden insurmountable for small companies; that will be enough. Disobey.
- renewiltord 3y agoHow does one provide the KYC information for open models?
- selfhoster11 3y agoMore to the point, why in the world should anyone "know" me to download a file? A simple antithesis of open technology, that's what this proposal is.
- dragonwriter 3y agoNothing in the order requires KYC information for open models.