4 ms·
I would suggest using https://github.com/pkolaczk/fclones https://github.com/pkolaczk/fclones instead. It's way faster.
by frankjr 3y ago
I would suggest using https://github.com/pkolaczk/fclones https://github.com/pkolaczk/fclones instead. It's way faster.
- branon 3y agoI've also seen https://github.com/jbruchon/jdupes https://github.com/jbruchon/jdupes used
- jwilk 3y ago"This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 6, 2023. It is now read-only." According to https://github.com/jbruchon/jdupes/commit/2984bd77f4712359 https://github.com/jbruchon/jdupes/commit/2984bd77f4712359, it's at https://codeberg.org/jbruchon/jdupes https://codeberg.org/jbruchon/jdupes now.
- bayindirh 3y agoThat’s much faster, and I use that too, yes.
- TacticalCoder 3y agoYup I use jdupes and it's way, way, way faster than fdupes.
- simula67 3y agoAnother option is duff: https://github.com/elmindreda/duff https://github.com/elmindreda/duff
- gorgoiler 3y ago@dang, an idea for GitHub URLs: could the URL truncator keep two path components instead of just one? The second part is the project name and often the more recognisable and interesting component.
- AnonHP 3y agoNot sure the @ symbol does any sort of tagging or notification. You may have better luck by emailing the suggestion to hn@ycombinator.com.
- Tommstein 3y ago> Not sure the @ symbol does any sort of tagging or notification. Unless I've read a lie repeated a million times, it doesn't.
- gorgoiler 3y agoThanks, but I think the level of effort I’ll put into distracting these good people with my feature request is going to be proportionate to how useful I think my request will be. (“Not much” and “not very”, respectively.)
- agumonkey 3y agoIt is surprisingly fast. Wait.. actually it's not surprising. Thanks a ton