4 ms·
>If they are, it'll almost certainly[1] be climate change or nuclear war, it won't be AI. If we go extinct in the next 100 years, it's not going to be from cli
by itsoktocry 3y ago
>If they are, it'll almost certainly[1] be climate change or nuclear war, it won't be AI.
If we go extinct in the next 100 years, it's not going to be from climate change. How would that even work?
- jchanimal 3y agoAgricultural pressure is one of the strongest predictors of unrest. Imagine that but not localized.
- jncfhnb 3y agoHuman extinction is not on the table. Societal collapse could be.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- hutzlibu 3y agoBasically, climate change would creates lots of problems, lots of hungry immigrants. And right now we are already close to a nuclear war, so climate change would not directly wipe out humanity.
- qerti 3y agoWarming the climate would increase the amount of arable land. Sea level rise happens very slowly, so most people don’t need to travel abroad to avoid it.
- hutzlibu 3y agoIt can also lead to more desertification and erosion, which I believe is rather the current trend.
- TeMPOraL 3y ago> Warming the climate would increase the amount of arable land. You mean land that would be arable at some far point in the future. The land reclaimed from ice isn't going to be arable in short-to-mid term - it's going to be a sterile swamp. It will take time to dry off, and more time still for the soil to become fertile.