9 ms·
To me, the two big things about ripgrep are (1) it's much more oriented towards the use case of searching a directory hierarchy full of code, eg by default it's
by twic 3y ago
To me, the two big things about ripgrep are (1) it's much more oriented towards the use case of searching a directory hierarchy full of code, eg by default it's recursive and respects .gitignore, it has a --type flag which knows various kinds of source files (eg --type c will only look at .c and .h files), etc, and (2) it's fast - uses all the lastest and greatest algorithms, and makes heavy use of parallelism. It's also just generally good and sensible.