> This is ridiculous. You're saying that anti-landmine orgs should spend their time finding more efficient ways to kill people. In a sense that this new weapon

> This is ridiculous. You're saying that anti-landmine orgs should spend their time finding more efficient ways to kill people. In a sense that this new weapon would obsolete land mines, and thus solve all problems of land mines. I don't see nothing ridiculous about that. > What if no such alternative exists? Just because it's economically efficient, doesn't mean it's right. Let us believe that it is not like that, otherwise ultimatly everyone that not uses child labor will die out, all that not uses land mines will lose a war. And no amount of negativity will stop it.