>Now I'm not saying this is bad. But ... Stop right there. The correct spelling is: "I'm not racist, but ...": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I%27m_not_racist,

>Now I'm not saying this is bad. But ... Stop right there. The correct spelling is: "I'm not racist, but ...": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I%27m_not_racist,_but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I%27m_not_racist,_but... >I'm not racist, but... is a phrase that often precedes a racist argument and provides a "veneer of political correctness".[1][2][3] Now look who's trying to be politically correct. >Interpretations: The phrase has been described as "hypocritical" and "apologetic". Eduardo Bonilla-Silva and Tyrone Forman argued that it is used by "the new racists, all the nice Whites".[4][5][6] Alana Lentin, in a op-ed for ABC, cited the phrase as an example of "how denying racism reproduces its violence".[7] Deutsche Welle's Torsten Landsberg and Rachel Stewart wrote that the refrain is "usually followed by an opinion that belies at best ignorance and at worst a deep-seated prejudice or even racially fueled hatred".[8] Ibram X. Kendi felt that its usage is an ineffective means of combating racism.[9] Your racism is a staggeringly stupid hill to bring up out of the blue, then chose to die on. There are two fucking wars that could lead to WWIII going on in Ukraine and Israel, and an anti semitic racist with 91 felony criminal indictments is running for president while his minions are trying to shut the government down, yet a photo of black people and white people working together is most important thing you can think of to hijack technical discussions and whine about? Stop trying to derail technical discussions about automatic dead code cleanup or any other topic into hysterical angry rants about your racism and your deep irrational resentment about pictures of black people and white people working together. We don't care, and it's off topic. Not to mention it's supremely ironic that a foaming-at-the-mouth crypto-bro get-rich-quick pyramid scheme shill and mathemagical pseudo-scientist like yourself would claim they refuse to accept warped portrayals of reality. Good luck with your grandiose project to compress random numbers, prove mathematicians and physicists have no idea what they're talking about, and invent perpetual motion machines. An algorithm for random data compression, code and paper by Matthew Roberts matthew@roberts.pm: https://news.knowledia.com/US/en/articles/an-algorithm-for-random-data-compression-2bdd8fd28ae34f47c1a40179e3a5396b8b5ad1cb https://news.knowledia.com/US/en/articles/an-algorithm-for-r... >I've been working on a method to compress random data and I think I may have something interesting to share now. I didn't expect to make much progress on this problem because I've been told it's impossible. But after dividing the problem into manageable pieces, I feel ready to share my solution with you all. >On a high-level part of what makes compressing random data, a difficult problem is how poorly equipped mathematics seems to be when it comes to randomness. Most of the time you can think of math as dealing with concrete, defined objects. That's what makes it a great tool for understanding the universe but a poor one for generating randomness. >[...] Read Full Article: https://web.archive.org/web/20210416013853/https://roberts.pm/index.php?p=article&path=rand&category=cryptography https://web.archive.org/web/20210416013853/https://roberts.p...