3 ms·
I think a lot of the "logical reason" is driven by more the ephemeral, sandboxed, execution tools. e.g. a `docker run` or `serverless` architectures, where full
by flakes 3y ago
I think a lot of the "logical reason" is driven by more the ephemeral, sandboxed, execution tools. e.g. a `docker run` or `serverless` architectures, where full root filesystems are populated on demand. Less executable data size there can go a long way in reducing latency/price.
- musicale 3y ago> Less executable data size there can go a long way in reducing latency/price. According to the article, Cosmo's fat binary dash was 30% larger but ran faster and used less real memory than Alpine's x86-linux-only version. However there is still probably a 30% overhead for storage and copying.