1. Cosmopolitan is great for building terminal apps like HTTP servers, but can't do GUIs. 2. Browsers are great at GUI apps, but depend on HTTP servers and emu

1. Cosmopolitan is great for building terminal apps like HTTP servers, but can't do GUIs. 2. Browsers are great at GUI apps, but depend on HTTP servers and emulate terminals poorly. So I view the two as being complementary. I imagine it's one of the reasons why Mozilla supported the project. Both platforms solve the portability problem, except for fundamentally different areas. Put them together and you get something greater than the sum of your parts.