3 ms·
I'm guessing you never had to debug spaghetti non OO code that used GOTO or you'd not be asking that question :D
by SillyUsername 3y ago
I'm guessing you never had to debug spaghetti non OO code that used GOTO or you'd not be asking that question :D
- gugagore 3y agoOO is a lot of things to a lot of people, but it's not "structured control flow".
- tester756 3y agoWhat's difference between debugging spaghetti non OO code from debuggin spaghetti abused OO code? both are terrible mess to debug, yet we aren't calling out ppl using (or even abusing) OOP
- SillyUsername 3y agoNothing from my POV. GOTO is more necessary (or even required) in procedural non OO languages because of fewer constructs to support modelling or structure. The OP mentioned redundant features, and in OO GOTO is redundant.