So it would be unenforceable because the enforcers would be on strike, right? But what's illegitimate about Taft Hartly though? I guess I read your statement as

So it would be unenforceable because the enforcers would be on strike, right? But what's illegitimate about Taft Hartly though? I guess I read your statement as saying that the law as written is illegal or unconstitutional. Curious about the reasoning there. Is it an appeal to natural rights?