3 ms·
If allowing ads is part of the terms of their service for non-paying users, then they are in fact free to not grant you access to the video feed. It's still sh
by zdragnar 3y ago
If allowing ads is part of the terms of their service for non-paying users, then they are in fact free to not grant you access to the video feed.
It's still shitty, but this isn't a thing where you can have your cake and eat it too.
- genocidicbunny 3y ago> then they are in fact free to not grant you access to the video feed. Correct, but as long as they do grant me access to the video feed, I should be free to modify how it is rendered on my end as I wish.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- JAlexoid 3y agoYou're not granted access to the video feed, unconditionally. You know, same as you're not granted any GPL code unconditionally. If you want unconditional video streams - Wikimedia is the place for you.