2 ms·

I posted what is known from Open Secrets. We will find out at the end of the trial what is ruled as valid evidence or not. (your source does not link "The doc

• gamblor956 3y ago
  ??? A jury does not generally review each piece of evidence to determine whether the evidence is "valid" or not. This evidence was already introduced at trial (in support of the conspiracy charges, since the campaign financing charge was dropped back in August). This means that the judge already reviewed it and deemed it to be valid, admissible evidence. (That happens before a trial, not after it, though in some cases may happen during a trial with the jury excused from the courtroom.) It's weird to blindly believe OpenSecrets, which also does not link to supporting documents, while disbelieving widely-reported news reporting that has been covered for the past year...without any refutation by the Republican beneficiaries of SBF's donations.
  • theultdev 3y ago
    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13Wq2kPw3C4X_50Tqc8H9mMrNynuwTlURDX1QWT3T_ck https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13Wq2kPw3C4X_50Tqc8H9... Open Secrets' data is just processed FEC data, you don't have to "believe" Open Secrets, you can verify the numbers yourself: https://www.fec.gov/introduction-campaign-finance/data-tutorials/ https://www.fec.gov/introduction-campaign-finance/data-tutor... My point was we don't have the data you are referencing to verify it the same way. Or do you??? (a CNBC article w/ no reference does not count)