3 ms·
> Perhaps I don't know what I'm missing. I think that's it. I've used both, and the switch from 16:9 to 16:10 was a regression. Way too much vertical cramping
by tivert 3y ago
> Perhaps I don't know what I'm missing.
I think that's it.
I've used both, and the switch from 16:9 to 16:10 was a regression. Way too much vertical cramping (and other dumb stuff, like fat bezels). I've switched back to 16:10 to the greatest degree possible.
4:3 to 16:10 was an actual improvement, because it gave more space for sidebar stuff. I'm curious if 3:2 would be a better compromise than 16:10, but I haven't had the chance to use a monitor like that.
- user_7832 3y ago> I'm curious if 3:2 would be a better compromise than 16:10, but I haven't had the chance to use a monitor like that. Unfortunately there was only one monitor made by Huawei that appears not in production. Panels still are available on aliexpress iirc.
- tivert 3y agoThere are also some laptops that use that ratio, but I mostly use desktop monitors.