3 ms·
No, you are being modded down for being crude. That kind of thing might be common on other forums, but not here.
by allenbrunson 18y ago
No, you are being modded down for being crude. That kind of thing might be common on other forums, but not here.
- iamdave 18y agoSometimes it takes an (admittedly erroneous) crude approach just to bring what should be an overt point to fruition. While this wasn't one of them, there are certainly times. And on that point, that's the feeling I get when I read this article. The writer is trying to be direct and ride the fence of "condemnation by realization" but only comes off as wrongly crude. While I haven't read any of Gladwell's book, I've seen him speak and he's got his wits about him regarding these things. Let's put it into perspective: how many of us can effectively lecture on the things he does?
- unalone 18y agoI don't think it's a very good article, but I agree with its premise. Gladwell is not scientifically rigid. His books are interesting and make me think, but I would not take any statistic he gave me as anything other than an interesting fiction. He's too selective about data.
- sharkfish 18y agoOMG you guys are idiots. I used the word "twat". Go ahead, take away the rest of my karma. My e-penis is going to shrink! OMG!!!! I'm a girl by the way. LOL. Again you guys are nancies. Total nancies. LOL. I continue laughing: http://crazyontap.com/topic.php?TopicId=42993 http://crazyontap.com/topic.php?TopicId=42993 P.S. Are you idiots RELIGIOUS, too? LOL.
- sharkfish 18y agoWHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!! You guys are badasses with the mouse.