The headline makes no sense, comparing the absolute size ("fringe") to a rate of change ("fastest-growing"). This is particularly egregious when you look at the

The headline makes no sense, comparing the absolute size ("fringe") to a rate of change ("fastest-growing"). This is particularly egregious when you look at the actual article because it is talking about relative growth over time, so being small/at the fringes actually makes it easier to achieve fast growth.