> it's really a crime that people like Nāgārjuna aren't covered in standard courses. I think I'd find a "standard course" (e.g. 1 term) on Nagarjuna deeply uns

> it's really a crime that people like Nāgārjuna aren't covered in standard courses. I think I'd find a "standard course" (e.g. 1 term) on Nagarjuna deeply unsatisfying. He's often presented as the inventor of Buddhist logic, but I don't think prajnaparamita makes a lot of sense as a philosophical system. Nagarjuna was a meditator's meditator, and his system of "logic" was supposed to rid the mind of conceptual thought. Also, one course wouldn't really cut it; people spend lifetimes studying prajnaparamita, and barely scratch the surface.