> Can someone explain again how an ML system scanning and training on a copyrighted work is different from a highly skilled artist doing the same? Because (for

> Can someone explain again how an ML system scanning and training on a copyrighted work is different from a highly skilled artist doing the same? Because (fortunately) human thoughts can't be subject to copyright law yet. So when we talk about copying and making derivative works, if you have this artistic works -> neural network weights The end result may or may not be copyrightable (that's for the courts to decide), but this artistic works -> human brain Definitively can't be