4 ms·
Should the link be http://rattlecad.com/ http://rattlecad.com/ instead of the archive? Looks pretty cool. With a recent release. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
by emmelaich 3y ago
Should the link be http://rattlecad.com/ http://rattlecad.com/ instead of the archive?
Looks pretty cool. With a recent release. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RattleCAD https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RattleCAD
Summary: it's a bicycle design tool, went from open source to proprietary in 2019.
- PostOnce 3y agothe archive.org page says: > Since release of rattleCAD 4.0 it turned into proprietary sotware, all the old source and binary files has been removed from its page on SourceForge, and a new official site has been launched.
- 0_____0 3y agoI think there's an argument to link to both. Since the OSS version was posted I think it's good to note the author's updated version even if it's no longer OSS. Looks like they want 30€/yr, which is far from extortionate if it's a good tool.
- cinntaile 3y agoAt €30/year they're underpricing their tool.
- app4soft 3y ago> Since the OSS version was posted I think it's good to note the author's updated version even if it's no longer OSS. To be clear, in the description on Internet Archive page all this info exists, including active link to "new official site" and a link to Wikipedia article, I've wrote, where all the story of rattleCAD development has been described in details.