3 ms·
Alphanullmeric said "ip shouldn't be a thing". Then CZL asked about the situation where "authorship is in doubt". To which I answered: You don't need no copyrig
by simbolit 3y ago
Alphanullmeric said "ip shouldn't be a thing".
Then CZL asked about the situation where "authorship is in doubt".
To which I answered: You don't need no copyright to be a liar and a fraud.
To which you answered: copyright is "the only thing preventing you"
To which I then answered: No, there are other forces guiding humans as well.
that was the "obvious" context.
But I doubt this will lead anywhere, tbh.
Have a good evening/morning (wherever you are located)
- Retric 3y agoAlphanullmeric is taking about IP in a legal context. They want the laws to change, rather than say killing off humanity which would also eventually eliminate IP. Legality is thus the basis for the discussion. Also, changing the text when you quote someone is dishonest and disrespectful. Swapping in ‘ip’ for ‘Intellectual property’ may seem meaningless to you, but they typed it out for a reason.