Ignoring the fact that most online services (and free software licenses) enforce limited liability, the actual demonstrable harm of bad LLM output stems from sh

Ignoring the fact that most online services (and free software licenses) enforce limited liability, the actual demonstrable harm of bad LLM output stems from sharing it. If you generate a harmful, hateful, incorrect or offensive LLM generation and publish it without context, you are responsible for spreading that information. The fact that someone (or something) else wrote it doesn't appear to have any meaningful difference in-context. I don't understand how anyone but the user could be liable for misusing an AI platform. If this upcoming legislation looks any different from Section 230, I'll be shocked.