3 ms·
Fair use by a machine is a concept which has hardly been studied by legislators. Personally I'd draw the line at the human/machine boundary.
by panta 3y ago
Fair use by a machine is a concept which has hardly been studied by legislators. Personally I'd draw the line at the human/machine boundary.
- theonlybutlet 3y agoFair enough, if that's is so, there's even less of a case to be made. The person inputting variables (i.e a prompt) into the model that prints out non-fair use outputs would be at fault. The end work would be the actual object subject to litigation. It's just a tool then. The current system still stands then. Arguing a trained model is infringing would then be like arguing the manufacturers of my monitor were infringing as it contained the very same RGB.as the artist.
- dragonwriter 3y ago> Fair use by a machine is a concept which has hardly been studied by legislators. I mean, that's true in the sense that "fair use by a pencil is a concept which hardly been studied by legislators" is true. Use (fair or not) isn't by the tool, its by the person using the tool.