3 ms·
>ou could literally make all this in probably 24 hours and not spend any time mucking around with prompts. I couldn’t make that art in 24 days. The big thing
by l33t7332273 3y ago
>ou could literally make all this in probably 24 hours and not spend any time mucking around with prompts.
I couldn’t make that art in 24 days.
The big thing about the state of current AI isn’t that it does a bunch of things, it’s that it drastically increases the number of people who can do things.
That is, I could not make this game in a day before AI. With it, maybe I could. I am far from unique.
- gowld 3y agoAnd it drastically increases the number of things a person can do.
- rchaud 3y ago> it’s that it drastically increases the number of people who can do things. Giving the whole world blogspot.com 20 years ago didn't measurably improve the internet, it just added a few more winners and a gigantic increase in low-quality spam pollution.
- l33t7332273 3y agoIf you’re saying blogspot is in the same ball park as generative AI I just don’t know how we can continue.
- rchaud 3y agoBloggers have broken news well in advance of large news outlets, partially because of the ability to publish online rapidly, without knowing HTML or administering a web server. But it's mostly been used to pollute the internet with useless spam. With generative AI, the same thing will happen. The very example shown here is an Angry Birds clone, patient zero of the pay-to-win hellscape of mobile games. I don't think it's an accident that they had AI in their hands and decided to build that.
- l33t7332273 3y agoYou don’t need to know HTML to send a tweet either. I would wager more news has broken there. > With generative AI, the same thing will happen I’m not sure what your point is. Of course it will. When powerful tools are available and perverse incentives exist, humans will follow them.