I'm not sure if you read the same one. The guy asking for "data that supports your claim that CO2 is a greenhouse gas" because he won't accept it without an alt

I'm not sure if you read the same one. The guy asking for "data that supports your claim that CO2 is a greenhouse gas" because he won't accept it without an alternate CO2-less Earth for comparison? Seems the experiment was convincing enough for him. >ozone is considered pollution on grown level and its UV radiation shield high up This is not even a false dichotomy.