4 ms·
> so the personal narrative is warranted, and I don't see that got in the way at all. I would actually like to know what SBF said on the stand that caused the
by duped 3y ago
> so the personal narrative is warranted, and I don't see that got in the way at all.
I would actually like to know what SBF said on the stand that caused the reactions in the gallery/jury and not the author's personal reaction.
ChatGPT can't do that because the author left out information.
- omarfarooq 3y agoThat information is literally the headline of the piece and the meat of the article. Perhaps you want the full transcript.
- mvdtnz 3y agoThere are very few direct quotes from SBF in the piece. In fact there are very few direct quotes from the prosecutor, the author preferring to summarise them and leaving us to guess as to how close they got. For example, > To each of those questions, Bankman-Fried replied, “No, but I might have.” > And then Sassoon played a clip from FTX’s official podcast. You are never going to guess what he said on the pod. I'm not here to guess. Give us a direct quote. (The questions were also not quoted, so they don't provide a direct quote either).
- duped 3y agoIt's really not, did we read the same article? There wasn't much "meat" to the article at all and only a sprinkling of quotes