While that's true, the court also said, that DNT is legally binding. That's also in the article from heise that you linked, in the second to last paragraph. Bu

While that's true, the court also said, that DNT is legally binding. That's also in the article from heise that you linked, in the second to last paragraph. But you're right. It sounds like the court interpreted it that way, but anyways, the ruling is only about the claim, not about whether they respect DNT or not.