2 ms·
Being charitable, it's plausible that they read the Tweet, did some recon on their end, determined that the websites were abusive, and banned them based on that
by scythe 3y ago
Being charitable, it's plausible that they read the Tweet, did some recon on their end, determined that the websites were abusive, and banned them based on that. Just because the Tweet was the only public information preceding the ban doesn't mean it was the only information.
- slig 3y agoCould be, but they reverted the decision after getting sh*t on twitter. It feels like they acted without much recon.