Thanks for answering. To me, that specific exchange is very blunt authorial voice and not at all realistic in context. (Out of context, I can easily imagine a

Thanks for answering. To me, that specific exchange is very blunt authorial voice and not at all realistic in context. (Out of context, I can easily imagine a future where AIs are plausibly sentient, and it’s taboo to talk about it for humans and AIs alike because one interpretation is that we re-enacted slavery. Etc etc.)