4 ms·
This is a completely misled interpretation of events, since automating my work to the scale of generative AI, there won't be any work left for humans. This "bu
by kranke155 3y ago
This is a completely misled interpretation of events, since automating my work to the scale of generative AI, there won't be any work left for humans.
This "but progress" argument is tiring. The Industrial Revolution was a complete failure if you measure quality of life in its first decades. It got turned around by people who you know, fought back, created unions, and demanded fair pay.
- EnergyAmy 3y ago> there won't be any work left for humans Good. That's the goal, and we can stop inventing stupid make-work for people when that happens. Jobs aren't the goal, making robots do all of the work is the goal. You're falling into the myopic trap of assuming that the current way of things won't change along with generative AI becoming commonplace.
- kranke155 3y agoI would agree. My fear is that in between the world we have now and the world where robots do everything, we have a giant valley of madness where robots take all the jobs, all the profits, and a lot of people are left with nothing.
- bcrosby95 3y agoThat's whose goal? It certainly isn't the goal of billionaires and people that run the country. By in large, their goal is to be rich and powerful: to have power over other people. You don't get that by eliminating the need to work. It would take an incredible amount of altruism to share your goal, and you don't become a billionaire by being altruistic.
- joquarky 3y ago> This "but progress" argument is tiring But progress is part of the foundational purpose of copyright: > To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.