3 ms·
Dishing out an EULA that contains non-enforceable terms should be criminalized. Probably if the deck wasn't so stacked for business, it would be quite clear to
by jampekka 3y ago
Dishing out an EULA that contains non-enforceable terms should be criminalized. Probably if the deck wasn't so stacked for business, it would be quite clear to interpret such EULAs as fraud or attempted fraud.
But as the GP said, the whole thing is a total corrupt farce.
- noirscape 3y agoTechnically EULAs with non-enforceable terms are meant to be thrown out as a whole in court, even in the US. Unfortunately every lawyer quickly caught on that their explorative legal fiction being thrown out entirely might make their employer unhappy, so most EULAs have some sort of clause that if a part becomes unenforceable, it won't break up the entire thing.
- lmm 3y agoA clause in the agreement that's already meant to be thrown out? Surely in any case where that clause would be relevant it's already void.