3 ms·
By modifying the site that way you're violating its ToS and can simply be denied service, as you are neither accepting or denying the request (you can't deny it
by nvm0n2 3y ago
By modifying the site that way you're violating its ToS and can simply be denied service, as you are neither accepting or denying the request (you can't deny it because you haven't read it).
Yeah you can claim otherwise and other people are free to just deny you service. EU still doesn't have access to Threads, right? Twitter is thinking of turning off the EU as well. That attitude is why. Trade is a two way street and constantly harassing the providers is a good way to find yourself without any services to harass anymore.
- PeterisP 3y agoConsent is not a request where the consumer has to make a decision to accept or deny, in EU consent is an opt-in activity. So there is a clear default state - doing nothing is the same thing as refusing a request, and refusing to even read any requests is a perfectly legitimate way of doing nothing. There is no legal or moral reason to afford the request any attention or consideration, if you're ignoring it, then you're not opting in, and the site has very clear explicit information that it doesn't have your consent.