4 ms·
This comment reads like an entitled gamer complaining about the next Call of Battlefield IV is "literally 0/10" for not including their favorite RGB-colored ski
by moss2 3y ago
This comment reads like an entitled gamer complaining about the next Call of Battlefield IV is "literally 0/10" for not including their favorite RGB-colored skin for a submachine gun.
- numbsafari 3y agoActually, no, the chair of the board is unapologetically fleecing the organization. You aren't donating to firefox the browser, you are donating to Mitchell Baker.
- joenot443 3y agoI don’t think it does at all, your comparison is pretty clumsy and inapplicable. To stretch the connection you made, it might be if Activision sought out R&D ventures and educational initiative instead of tending to its golden goose, which in reality it obviously does, as is its responsibility. Firefox is Mozilla’s flagship product, the organization wouldn’t exist in its current form without it. It’s understandable if people are frustrated it doesn’t appear to be getting the org wide funding it proportionally deserves.
- PurpleRamen 3y agoWhere did I say Firefox is bad? Lacking a selling point which distinguish it from competition does not mean it's generally bad, it's just not good enough to bring in enough new users to balance out the loss of users.
- freedomben 3y agoI've been seeing this sort of laziness all over lately. Some people seem unable to separate analysis/criticism with opinion on overall worth/merit. i.e. if you think there's anything wrong with Organization X, then you must hate them or secretly be a supporter of Organization Y, their arch nemesis. It's annoying at best, dangerous at worst (because that type of thinking can lead to behavior/decisions that are never questioned or challenged).