> Either things are causal, in which case, you can replay everything and arrive at the same point. That doens't fit an intuitive definition of free will. I thi

> Either things are causal, in which case, you can replay everything and arrive at the same point. That doens't fit an intuitive definition of free will. I think this is somewhat inaccurate. I'm not sure if I personally agree with it, but at the very least compatibilism is a serious philosophical viewpoint and shouldn't just be dismissed like this. In any case I think the concept of "free will" is pretty much independent of randomness. If you provide me with some source of randomness (e.g. some quantum random number generator) I don't think I get more free because of it.