4 ms·
The author's skepticism is pretty reasonable, but I feel that he misses an important part of the story. Here's the closest he gets to it: "Is it plausible that
by sedev 15y ago
The author's skepticism is pretty reasonable, but I feel that he misses an important part of the story. Here's the closest he gets to it:
"Is it plausible that this practice is widespread, and getting moreso? Sure, it’s plausible. Our privacy erodes every day, and millions of us do it through Facebook willingly. The story has the feel of truthiness. Doesn’t it just seem like the thing that Big Business would do to us? We already piss in cups to prove that we’re drug-free so that we can come in and shuffle paper."
I think that the reason that the Facebook issue blew up so well is that it touches on two major fears that people have, at least one of which is entirely reasonable. It's the fear that corporations control everything and aren't accountable to the law. As far as I'm concerned, that's a reasonable and well-founded fear. I grant the author's point that the issue at hand may be over-hyped, but I think that the fact that people are so worried that it's easy to press that particular button, should definitely tell us something about how much inappropriate power corporations have, and how little accountability.
- signalsignal 15y agoI'd say that its not a constant fear to most people, it is more of a aggravation or annoyance. In my experience most people don't share too many personal details online even with their closest friend network. I do have one question, why does the author use BOLD text in the article in such a haphazard manner?
- petdance 15y ago> I do have one question, why does the author use BOLD text in the article in such a haphazard manner? You could post a comment on the blog and ask. I'd have answered. I bold the text for the key points that I want people to take away. I suspect that most people skim articles longer than a few paragraphs anyway, so I want to help them to the key points. Some of the comments I'm seeing about the article only reinforce my conclusion that many readers never read beyond the headline or first paragraph.